dimecres, 21 d’abril de 2010



Cuenta una antigua leyenda, que en la Edad Media, un hombre muy virtuoso fue injustamente acusado de haber asesinado a una mujer. En realidad, el verdadero autor era una persona muy influyente del reino y por eso, desde el primer momento buscaron a un "chivo expiatorio" para encubrir al verdadero culpable.

El hombre fue llevado a juicio, ya conociendo que tendría escasas o
ninguna oportunidad de escapar al terrible veredicto: ¡LA HORCA!

El Juez, también cómplice, cuidó de dar todo el aspecto de un juicio
justo y por esta razón le dijo al acusado:

"Conociendo tu fama de hombre justo y devoto del Señor, vamos a dejar en manos de Él tu destino. Vamos a escribir en dos papeles separados las palabras culpable e inocente. Tu escogerás uno de ellos y será la mano de Dios la que decida tu destino"

Por supuesto, el funcionario corrupto había preparado dos papeles con la misma leyenda: "CULPABLE" y la pobre víctima, aún sin conocer los detalles, se dio cuenta que el sistema propuesto era una trampa. No había escapatoria. El Juez conminó al hombre a tomar uno de los papeles doblados.

Éste inspiró profundamente, quedó en silencio unos cuantos segundos con los ojos cerrados pensando, y cuando la sala comenzaba ya a  impacientarse, abrió los ojos y con una extraña sonrisa, escogió y agarró uno de los papeles y llevándolo a su boca, lo engulló rápidamente.

Sorprendidos e indignados los presentes, le reprocharon airadamente.

Pero... ¿qué hizo?... ¿Y ahora?... ¿Cómo vamos a saber el veredicto?

"Es muy sencillo" respondió el acusado, "Es cuestión de leer el papel
que queda y sabremos que decía el que yo escogí"

Con rezongos y disgustos mal disimulados, tuvieron que liberar al
acusado, y jamás volvieron a molestarlo.

*_Moraleja_: *

Por más difícil que se nos presente una situación, nunca dejemos de buscar la salida ni de luchar hasta el último momento.
 ¡¡¡ SE CREATIVO !!!



  En los momentos de crisis:

  "Sólo la imaginación es más importante que el conocimiento"

   Albert Einstein


Corrupt Practices Accelerating the Decline of American Journalism

We have people posturing as journalists on TV who get paid as business spokespeople, financial reporters who retire to work for Goldman Sachs -- media parasites. 
No matter how much this week's Pulitzer Prize triumphalism hides it, the fact remains that journalism these days is "a disaster," as Ted Koppel said recently. And unfortunately, retrospection dominates the news industry's self-analysis. Like dazed tornado victims, most media experts focus on what happened and why, oh lord, why?.

The queries are important, though just as critical are two prospective questions: 1) If, to butcher a Chinese aphorism, every crisis is an opportunity, then who is making an opportunity out of journalism's current crisis and 2) are those opportunity-maximizers actually parasites destroying journalism for the long haul?.

***Els periodistes mai han tingut ética. Qui paga mana.
Avui blanc  demà negre.

The answer to the initial question is three groups, starting with the Access Traders. These are reporters like The New Yorker's Ryan Lizza, Newsweek's Jonathan Alter and NBC's Chuck Todd, who, while covering politics for major media, are also signing separate contracts to write books chronicling White House gossip. Facing a crisis in audience share, these correspondents' employers encourage the double-dip opportunities, hoping book exposure will result in residual attention. But the simultaneity is problematic: As the Washington Post's Howard Kurtz notes, hard-hitting stories in these reporters' day jobs "might alienate potential (book) sources and flattering ones might loosen tongues."

The dynamic's deleterious effect on journalism is obvious.

"The oozing conflicts lead to things like a glowing New Yorker profile of (Obama aide) Rahm Emanuel followed by an even more one-sided love letter to (Obama aide) Larry Summers, both from Lizza," says Salon.com's Glenn Greenwald. "It's what causes Alter to proclaim one day – when Obama favored it – that real health reform 'depends on whether Obama gets approval for a public option' only to turn around – once Obama said (the public option) was unnecessary – and proclaim that the left is foolishly obsessing on the unimportant public option. And it's what leads Todd, in the form of 'covering the White House' for NBC, to serve as an amplifying vessel and justifier for whatever the White House happens to be saying."

Add to this the Double Agents – those making opportunities out of journalism's revenue crisis. Knowing cash-strapped media outlets are providing platforms to corporate advocates rather than spending extra money to employ their own independent voices, various chameleons at once posture as journalists and get paid as business spokespeople.

Richard Wolffe, for instance, has appeared on MSNBC as a supposedly objective pundit while also being employed by a business advocacy firm. Likewise, Jeff Birnbaum heads a lobbying and PR company while writing a Washington Times column – and a recent one attacked Democrats for defying industries that pay his company.

Birnbaum, of course, was previously the Washington Post correspondent covering the lobbying industry, and so his career shift also puts him in the last group: the Former Watchdogs.

To understand why these turncoats so threaten journalism, consider not only Birnbaum, but also Stephen Labaton. This New York Times financial reporter just announced he is taking a job with Goldman Sachs – a move that makes you wonder if Labaton watered down his Times coverage in order to get his new gig.

As with similar revolving-door situations, it's a legitimate worry – after all, Labaton knew Goldman probably wouldn't hire a muckraker who had been aggressively exposing bank transgressions. Then again, maybe Labaton did nothing wrong. Either way, though, the damage is done because the concern now can – and must – be aired, which itself helps destroy the idea that traditional news is impartial and trustworthy.

In aggregate, this all ends up answering the original query: Are many of today's opportunity-maximizers destroying journalism? Clearly, yes – and unless media sachems institute some basic ethics rules, the parasites within their ranks could end up making sure there's no journalism industry left to save.
David Sirota is the author of the best-selling books Hostile Takeover and The Uprising. He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado and blogs at OpenLeft.com.

Ja podeu canviar les contrasenyes de Google

Cyberattack on Google Said to Hit Password System

Ever since Google disclosed in January that Internet intruders had stolen information from its computers, the exact nature and extent of the theft has been a closely guarded company secret. But a person with direct knowledge of the investigation now says that the losses included one of Google’s crown jewels, a password system that controls access by millions of users worldwide to almost all of the company’s Web services, including e-mail and business applications.

Article complet al NYT: